GUILTY or a Political Game? What Julius Malema’s Firearm Trial Really Means for South Africa
Julius Malema—the firebrand leader of the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)—is back in the courtroom spotlight, but this time, it's not just about political speeches or rallying crowds. It’s about a firearm, a stage, and a video that has the entire country asking one question: Did Malema actually pull the trigger?
On Monday, 21 July, inside the East London Magistrates Court, the prosecution did not mince words. Advocate Joel Cesar stood before the bench and declared: “The evidence that has been presented in this court is real.” In a bold statement, the state said it had proven—beyond reasonable doubt—that Malema and his bodyguard Adrian Snyman were guilty of firing a gun during the EFF’s 5th Anniversary bash in 2018.
Video footage was central to the state’s case. According to Cesar, that clip—showing Malema allegedly discharging a firearm into the air—was all the court needed. He claimed the crowd’s visible reaction, people scattering, running, fearing for their lives, was “clear and undeniable.”
But Malema’s legal team wasn’t about to let that narrative go unchallenged.
Advocate Laurence Hodes, defending Malema, dismantled the prosecution’s reliance on the video. “Where’s the weapon?” he asked. “Where’s the ballistic match? Where’s the damage?” Hodes pointed out that no single cartridge found at the scene could be linked to Malema. Even more puzzling? None of the five police officers on stage that day testified to seeing anything alarming. Not even one person in that massive crowd of supporters came forward as a witness or complainant.
No fear. No victims. Just a viral video.
The defence didn’t stop there. Snyman’s lawyer, Advocate Shane Matthews, argued that the entire case was built on assumptions. The state never proved that Snyman gave Malema a weapon or that either of them posed any threat. Matthews bluntly stated: “Police picked up a video from social media. That’s the only foundation they have.”
Despite the arguments, the mood around the case is charged. There’s an undeniable sense that this trial carries political weight. Malema is no stranger to controversy. His speeches, his actions, and now this alleged firearm incident all contribute to a polarizing image—either revolutionary or reckless, depending on who you ask.
But here’s the real kicker: what happens next could change everything.
The court has postponed judgment to 29 September 2025. Until then, South Africans are left wondering—will this be the moment Malema is finally held accountable, or will it be another chapter in the political theatre that often surrounds powerful figures?
Public opinion is split, and as with anything Malema-related, emotions are running high. Some say it’s justice. Others see it as a smear campaign aimed at neutralizing one of the country’s most vocal political forces.
The prosecution says the video is proof enough. The defence says it’s not even credible evidence. And somewhere in the middle, ordinary South Africans are watching, waiting, and wondering who to believe.
One thing is clear: this isn’t just about whether a firearm was fired. It’s about who Julius Malema is, what he represents, and how far South Africa's legal system will go when politics and justice collide.
The wait begins...
📢 Tell us what YOU think!
Do you believe Julius Malema is guilty or just being targeted?
🔻Drop your thoughts below or vote in the poll!
Read also: Why Young South Africans Are Fleeing the Job Market
Read also: How Load Shedding Is Quietly Destroying Local Businesses
Read also: Telkom's Bold Rebrand: What It Really Means
If you’d like more real-time stories like this, gently tap the Follow button and stay in the loop with everything that matters in South Africa.
~BILLY JAYDEN LOUIS
Sources
Telkom reveals new logo
JUST IN: Prosecutor - Malema is guilty!
Tags: Julius Malema, EFF, East London Magistrates Court, firearm trial, South African politics, court news, 2025 news
%20%E2%80%93%20Scaled%20(95%25).png){kind=tracking}
Comments